NASA’s New Chief Just Put a Fresh Twist on the Texas Space Shuttle Saga
NASA’s new boss Jared Isaacman hinted that he could break with Texas lawmakers’ push to move iconic space shuttle Discovery from the Smithsonian to Houston
Space shuttle Discovery rolls into its hangar for display at the Smithsonian in 2012.
Dane Penland/Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum
The great Texas space shuttle saga has taken a new twist: Jared Isaacman, President Donald Trump’s pick to lead NASA, indicated that the space shuttle Discovery may not move from its retirement home in a Smithsonian museum to Houston after all despite a Texas lawmaker push over the past year to make it happen.
The effort to shift Discovery from its hangar in Chantilly, Va., an annex of the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum, was previously described as a “heist” by Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois in July—that same month, the move was enshrined into law by the Trump administration’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which provided $85 million to transfer the shuttle to the Space Center Houston museum within 18 months. Yet in a recent interview with CNBC, Isaacman said that whether the spacecraft can be moved remained to be seen.
“My job now is to make sure that we can undertake such a transportation within the budget dollars that we have available and, of course, most importantly, ensuring the safety of the vehicle,” Isaacman said. NASA and the Smithsonian have estimated that moving Discovery would cost at least $120 million.
On supporting science journalism
If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
If it turns out not to be possible, he added, then NASA could ultimately move a different vehicle to Houston. “We’ve got spacecraft that are going around the moon with Artemis II, III, IV and V. One way or another, we’re going to make sure that Johnson Space Center gets their historic spacecraft,” Isaacman said.
Space scientists and legal experts previously decried Discovery’s move in interviews with Scientific American as a “theft” and “a vanity project.” Others expressed concern that the Texas museum would not be able to properly house and maintain the spacecraft.
Amanda Montañez; Source: NASA Office of Inspector General (data)
“Such a move would be a waste of money—a vanity project that is apt to destroy a near-priceless American treasure,” Matthew Hersch, a fellow in legal history at New York University School of Law and an associate of the Harvard University Department of the History of Science, told Scientific American.
“The removal of Discovery from the Smithsonian Institution would be a theft, by the federal government, of a $2-billion artifact from a private museum that owns it and has been maintaining it properly for over a decade,” he said.
Discovery was first launched in 1984, completing 39 missions to space—more than any of the four other space shuttles NASA built that went to space—including a mission to loft the Hubble Space Telescope into orbit in 1990.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.