Close Menu
    Trending
    • Warriors elder statesmen stun Clippers in comeback win 
    • To thrive in the age of AI, don’t reinvent yourself. Try this instead
    • Neanderthal infants were enormous compared with modern humans
    • The Rise Of AI In Payments Is Not About Convenience
    • Allison Williams Addresses Lena Dunham’s Adam Driver Accusations
    • Trump says Israel and Lebanon talks to happen on Thursday
    • Trump says Israel and Lebanon’s leaders will speak on Thursday | Israel attacks Lebanon News
    • Erik Spoelstra rips LaMelo Ball for ‘dangerous play’ that injured Bam Adebayo
    Benjamin Franklin Institute
    Thursday, April 16
    • Home
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Science
    • Technology
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • International
    Benjamin Franklin Institute
    Home»Opinions»Opinion | The N.I.H. Director Thinks Covid Probably Started in a Lab
    Opinions

    Opinion | The N.I.H. Director Thinks Covid Probably Started in a Lab

    Team_Benjamin Franklin InstituteBy Team_Benjamin Franklin InstituteJanuary 30, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link


    And I think a lot of scientists agree with me that the best available evidence suggests that the pandemic was the result of a lab accident that happened in Wuhan, China. “Where did Covid start?” “There is still no consensus on the origins of the virus.” “And I think that most Americans think that Covid-19 came from that lab in Wuhan. I certainly do.” What percentage odds of that being true, would you say? It’s pretty close to certain. I tend to be on the side of the scientists that think that it was a lab leak based on other things. There was a whole effort by the scientific community, by the N.I.H., the Chinese scientific groups and European groups essentially to prevent all pandemics. The research program was you go into the wild places, find viruses in those wild places —— Find the bats. Find the bats. Now there’s a trillion or more viruses out there, most of which do not infect have any chance of infecting humans. So you don’t know which of those viruses you’re pulling out of the wild places into the lab are likely to jump into humans. And so the argument was in this 2000 — let’s say 2003 to 2020-some era is that we have to manipulate those viruses, make them potentially more dangerous and more infectious to humans in order to triage, and identify the viruses and pathogens that are closer to making the leap into humans in some evolutionary sense, and then prepare countermeasures. This is what so-called gain of function research is trying to do? It’s trying to essentially hype up multiple viruses, and the ones that become the most deadly are the ones you try and treat? Yes, or in advance of it ever infecting a human being. The countermeasures that you develop for those pathogens in the lab that have never made the leap into humans will obviously never have been tested in humans — the vaccines you develop — because no human has ever been infected by that. So you’ll have a set of vaccines whose efficacy is hypothetical, right? Or it could be other countermeasures, but let’s say vaccines. So this but — so part of the scientific establishment was committed to this project —— Including the N.I.H. Including the N.I.H. And there was, at the very least, a good chance that that led to Covid-19 and the pandemic. Why, then, do you think that overcommitted the establishment to school closures, mask mandates, and everything else? What is the link there? OK, so what if you open Pandora’s box, what would you do? You’ve unleashed hell on the world and you’ve done it. You’re responsible for it. What would you do?



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    Opinion | GLP-1 Experimentation Is Everywhere, and Science Can’t Keep Up

    April 15, 2026
    Opinions

    Opinion | Israel’s ‘One-State Reality’

    April 15, 2026
    Opinions

    Opinion | Can a Bot Love You Back?

    April 14, 2026
    Opinions

    Opinion | ‘I Don’t Want a Person, I Want an A.I.’

    April 14, 2026
    Opinions

    Opinion | Reckoning With Israel’s ‘One-State Reality’

    April 14, 2026
    Opinions

    Opinion | The Moral Cost of Trump’s War

    April 14, 2026
    Editors Picks

    Love Machine review: We’re getting intimate with chatbots. A new book asks what this means

    January 17, 2026

    How a midlife tune-up could help prepare you for a healthy old age

    March 18, 2026

    Trump heads to Pennsylvania rally on the affordability crisis. Here’s what to know

    December 9, 2025

    Gucci just proved why luxury brands shouldn’t use AI

    February 25, 2026

    Opinion | The Rural Power Behind Trump’s Assault on Blue Cities

    October 21, 2025
    About Us
    About Us

    Welcome to Benjamin Franklin Institute, your premier destination for insightful, engaging, and diverse Political News and Opinions.

    The Benjamin Franklin Institute supports free speech, the U.S. Constitution and political candidates and organizations that promote and protect both of these important features of the American Experiment.

    We are passionate about delivering high-quality, accurate, and engaging content that resonates with our readers. Sign up for our text alerts and email newsletter to stay informed.

    Latest Posts

    Warriors elder statesmen stun Clippers in comeback win 

    April 16, 2026

    To thrive in the age of AI, don’t reinvent yourself. Try this instead

    April 16, 2026

    Neanderthal infants were enormous compared with modern humans

    April 16, 2026

    Subscribe for Updates

    Stay informed by signing up for our free news alerts.

    Paid for by the Benjamin Franklin Institute. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
    • Privacy Policy
    • About us
    • Contact us

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.