Close Menu
    Trending
    • Warning shot or publicity stunt – how worried should we be about the OpenAI hack?
    • Mamdani, Who Said Israel ‘Not a Place,’ Gets Roasted for Wishing Jewish NYCers ‘Peaceful’ Holiday That’s Definitely About Israel Being a Place
    • ‘The Ultimatum’ Star Blake Robertson Shares Relationship Update
    • US missiles hit Iran as path towards de-escalation uncertain
    • UN rights chief Turk wins second term despite US and Israeli opposition | United Nations News
    • LeBron’s decision might force Jalen Brunson to do the unthinkable
    • 8 Unique Side Hustle Ideas for Summer 2026 and Beyond
    • NHTSA considers new car door safety rules after fatal Tesla crashes
    Benjamin Franklin Institute
    Saturday, July 25
    • Home
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Science
    • Technology
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • International
    Benjamin Franklin Institute
    Home»Science»How worried should you be about screentime?
    Science

    How worried should you be about screentime?

    Team_Benjamin Franklin InstituteBy Team_Benjamin Franklin InstituteDecember 29, 2025No Comments5 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link


    Marco_Piunti/Getty Images

    Wait, stop scrolling! How long have you been on your phone today? Is social media rotting your brain? We are constantly asking questions like these, but just how worried should you be about your screen time?

    There are literally hundreds of thousands of studies looking at screen time, and many of them have found links between using screens and a huge variety of health issues, including depression, anxiety, poor sleep, obesity, diabetes and even suicide. It all sounds pretty bad.

    There’s just one question: are screens themselves causing these issues, or is poor health causing increased screen time? Or could there even be an unknown, third factor influencing both?

    The vast majority of these studies can’t tell you, because they merely show a correlation between screen time and health. Identifying causation – the real impact screen time is having – is much harder.

    To get to the bottom of this, researchers conduct meta-analyses that pull together hundreds of high-quality studies using more advanced statistical techniques. Doing this, a lot of the harm seems to disappear.

    My favourite such meta-analysis – yes, of course I have a favourite meta-analysis – was conducted in 2019. The researchers, Amy Orben and Andrew Przybylski, both then at the University of Oxford, looked at a huge dataset of questionnaires given to teenagers, allowing them to compare the effects of more than 20,000 different factors on the participants’ mental health.

    Crunching the numbers, they found that only 0.4 per cent of adolescent well-being was related to screen use, a level of negative effect comparable to eating potatoes. By comparison, being bullied was associated with more than four times this negative effect, while getting enough sleep and eating a good breakfast were associated with much larger positive effects.

    “
    What the data seems to be telling us is that on average – on a population level – the positive and negative effects of screens are small
    “

    So, screen time is fine? Well, again, let’s not be so hasty. Despite putting the links between screen time and mental health in context with other factors, these are still only correlations. People’s lives are messy, and extracting causation from messy data is hard.

    One way to unpick the noise might be to ask what we actually mean by screen time. Watching TV, scrolling through social media on your phone, playing video games, reading an e-book or listening to a science journalist talk about screen time all involve staring at a screen, but would we expect them all to have the same impact on our health?

    Many studies don’t take a particularly sophisticated approach to this question, simply counting up the number of hours spent looking at a screen – and to make matters worse, this data is often self-reported, which we know makes it less likely to be accurate. (Come on, we all lie about it.)

    Even if we focus on just social media, that encompasses so many things. Arguing about politics on X until 3am and messaging your friends on WhatsApp are both examples of using social media, but do they have the same effect? A meta-analysis published in 2024 in the journal SSM – Mental Health attempted to tease this out, finding small positive correlations between well-being and using social media for communication or having lots of social media-based friends. It also found small negative correlations with comparing yourself with others on social media or with problematic social media use – what we might call “being addicted” to social media. None of that sounds particularly surprising, right?

    Where, then, does that leave us? Given the potential risk for harm, we could adopt the precautionary principle, particularly when it comes to children. We could heavily restrict their screen time or even introduce bans on certain types of tech use, like social media, as the UK and Australian governments are doing.

    But I worry that doing this could see us miss out on the benefits of screen time – information, social connection, entertainment and more. What the data seems to be telling us, as much as we can glean through all the noise, is that on average – on a population level – the positive and negative effects of screens are small. That doesn’t mean there aren’t some people who experience much larger harms – those problematic users I talked about before – and we need to understand much more to help them.

    Considering all that, how worried should you be about screen time? The answer is a complex one, based on still-evolving research. If you find screens interfering with your life in a major way, changing behaviour might be useful, as could seeking medical advice. For most of us, though, screen use shouldn’t be particularly high on your list of worries – and certainly not as high as headlines might leave you to believe.

    Topics:



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link

    Related Posts

    Science

    NHTSA considers new car door safety rules after fatal Tesla crashes

    July 24, 2026
    Science

    Fungus made fashion—researchers turn living organisms into textiles

    July 24, 2026
    Science

    How a 99-year-old mathematician unraveled a century-old braid mystery

    July 24, 2026
    Science

    Is it possible to regain a sense of smell? These scientists are working on it

    July 24, 2026
    Science

    Why don’t insects live in the ocean?

    July 24, 2026
    Science

    Why environmental groups are suing over SpaceX’s land swap deal

    July 24, 2026
    Editors Picks

    Canada’s Economy Shrinks By 0.6% In Q4 2025

    March 3, 2026

    ‘Slaughtering the oil industry’: UK’s shift to renewables sparks fears among oil and gas workers

    March 16, 2026

    Navigating World Cup stadiums is going to be a logistical nightmare. Here’s how Uber wants to help

    May 30, 2026

    New Scientist Book Club: Read an extract from Art Cure by Daisy Fancourt

    February 28, 2026

    Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is being explored as a long COVID treatment. Here’s what the research shows

    June 2, 2026
    About Us
    About Us

    Welcome to Benjamin Franklin Institute, your premier destination for insightful, engaging, and diverse Political News and Opinions.

    The Benjamin Franklin Institute supports free speech, the U.S. Constitution and political candidates and organizations that promote and protect both of these important features of the American Experiment.

    We are passionate about delivering high-quality, accurate, and engaging content that resonates with our readers. Sign up for our text alerts and email newsletter to stay informed.

    Latest Posts

    Warning shot or publicity stunt – how worried should we be about the OpenAI hack?

    July 25, 2026

    Mamdani, Who Said Israel ‘Not a Place,’ Gets Roasted for Wishing Jewish NYCers ‘Peaceful’ Holiday That’s Definitely About Israel Being a Place

    July 25, 2026

    ‘The Ultimatum’ Star Blake Robertson Shares Relationship Update

    July 25, 2026

    Subscribe for Updates

    Stay informed by signing up for our free news alerts.

    Paid for by the Benjamin Franklin Institute. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
    • Privacy Policy
    • About us
    • Contact us

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.