Close Menu
    Trending
    • A High School Dropout Tackled Online Returns — Now Makes $500M
    • How a Futurama plotline led to a totally new math proof
    • Journey Guitarist Slams Bruce Springsteen as ‘Annoying, Bitter Old Man’ for Turning Concerts into Anti-Trump Political Rallies * The Gateway Pundit * by Cassandra MacDonald
    • ‘Health Issue’ Halts Harry Styles’ Brazil Concert
    • Murdered ex-UK minister Widdecombe was struck on head with hammer 21 times, court told
    • US appeals court overturns ruling that freed Columbia activist Mahdawi | Censorship News
    • The ‘Active 20-HR season leaders’ quiz
    • Burger King President Says GLP-1s Will Have ‘Impact’ on Industry
    Benjamin Franklin Institute
    Tuesday, July 21
    • Home
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Science
    • Technology
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • International
    Benjamin Franklin Institute
    Home»World Economy»Russia Can Now Disconnect Citizens And Entire Regions From The Internet
    World Economy

    Russia Can Now Disconnect Citizens And Entire Regions From The Internet

    Team_Benjamin Franklin InstituteBy Team_Benjamin Franklin InstituteFebruary 24, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link


    A new law signed by Putin grants the FSB the authority to order telecom operators to disconnect individuals from internet and mobile services. This long trajectory toward centralized digital control that has been unfolding for years, especially since the 2019 “sovereign internet” framework, which already laid the groundwork for isolating Russia’s domestic network from the global internet if necessary.

    The legislation helps telecommunications providers to cut communications access upon the requirement of the FSB, while shielding those companies from any legal liability for outages. In practical terms, that means the state security apparatus can legally disconnect individuals or entire regions from the internet and mobile networks at will, under conditions defined by presidential regulation.

    Governments historically move to control information flows first, long before they impose overt capital controls. I have warned repeatedly that the next phase of government intervention would not begin with seizing bank accounts outright, but with restricting the free flow of communication. The new law allows authorities to restrict connectivity without court oversight, which further centralizes power in the executive and security services. The bill evolved from vague “requests” to binding “requirements” from the FSB, meaning telecom providers are legally required to comply with shutdown orders across internet, mobile, calls, and messaging services.

    They justify this as counter-terrorism and defense against security threats, including drone warfare and cyber risks, yet historically such language has always been used to expand state surveillance powers. Russian authorities have already blocked major platforms, restricted messaging services, and pushed citizens toward state-monitored applications, all under the banner of national security and technological sovereignty.

    Digital shutdowns increase systemic risk in modern economies that rely on online banking, digital payments, logistics, and real-time financial transactions. Even temporary internet disruptions can trigger spikes in cash withdrawals and anxiety over digital isolation, which is a classic sign of declining institutional trust.

    The Soviet Union restricted communication channels, China built the Great Firewall, and now Russia is formalizing a legal framework to disconnect individuals digitally. By granting the FSB authority to disconnect communications nationwide or individually, the state effectively gains a “kill switch” over the digital economy. That extends beyond politics into commerce, finance, and even emergency infrastructure. Control the communication networks, and you control the flow of capital, opinion, and resistance. That has always been the unspoken objective behind expanding surveillance laws, regardless of the political system implementing them.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link

    Related Posts

    World Economy

    Musk’s Unrealistic Future View Is A New World Communist Vision

    July 21, 2026
    World Economy

    Putin Meets With Top North Korean Diplomat

    July 21, 2026
    World Economy

    Mamdani Claims He Will Arrest Netanyahu

    July 21, 2026
    World Economy

    America’s Food Supply Has Become Too Big To Fail – Cyclospora

    July 21, 2026
    World Economy

    Iran Expected To Expand The War Throughout The Middle East

    July 21, 2026
    World Economy

    Market Talk – July 20, 2026

    July 20, 2026
    Editors Picks

    Tottenham Hotspur vs Arsenal: Premier League – team news, start, lineups | Football News

    February 21, 2026

    Jason Kelce sends A.J. Brown warning to Eagles

    February 14, 2026

    Expert Reveals Why Stars Like George Clooney Have Left Hollywood For France

    March 29, 2026

    Jonah Hill Revisits Kanye West’s ‘Bizarre’ Past With Love

    April 7, 2026

    Opinion | In Appalachia, Children Inherited the Opioid Crisis

    December 22, 2025
    About Us
    About Us

    Welcome to Benjamin Franklin Institute, your premier destination for insightful, engaging, and diverse Political News and Opinions.

    The Benjamin Franklin Institute supports free speech, the U.S. Constitution and political candidates and organizations that promote and protect both of these important features of the American Experiment.

    We are passionate about delivering high-quality, accurate, and engaging content that resonates with our readers. Sign up for our text alerts and email newsletter to stay informed.

    Latest Posts

    A High School Dropout Tackled Online Returns — Now Makes $500M

    July 21, 2026

    How a Futurama plotline led to a totally new math proof

    July 21, 2026

    Journey Guitarist Slams Bruce Springsteen as ‘Annoying, Bitter Old Man’ for Turning Concerts into Anti-Trump Political Rallies * The Gateway Pundit * by Cassandra MacDonald

    July 21, 2026

    Subscribe for Updates

    Stay informed by signing up for our free news alerts.

    Paid for by the Benjamin Franklin Institute. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
    • Privacy Policy
    • About us
    • Contact us

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.