Close Menu
    Trending
    • IEEE’s 2026 Education Week Emphasized Lifelong Learning
    • Jelly Roll Gets To Scrubbing As Divorce News Goes Viral
    • ‘I’m the boss’, Trump says at G7, as he warms to Ukraine’s war aims
    • Trump pushes to delay appointment of new spy chief in legislative standoff | Donald Trump News
    • The ‘NFL active sack leaders’ quiz
    • Opinion | We Should Expect More From Our Supreme Court
    • Nvidia’s Jensen Huang shares 3 key points about the future of AI
    • Could this ancient burial site be the oldest lethal plague outbreak?
    Benjamin Franklin Institute
    Wednesday, June 17
    • Home
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Science
    • Technology
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • International
    Benjamin Franklin Institute
    Home»Science»RFK, Jr., shifts focus to questioning whether cell phones are safe. Here’s what the science says
    Science

    RFK, Jr., shifts focus to questioning whether cell phones are safe. Here’s what the science says

    Team_Benjamin Franklin InstituteBy Team_Benjamin Franklin InstituteJanuary 18, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link


    January 16, 2026

    2 min read

    Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm

    RFK, Jr., shifts focus to questioning whether cell phones are safe. Here’s what the science says

    The possible health effects of radiofrequency waves emitted by cell phones has been a subject of debate for decades

    By Jackie Flynn Mogensen edited by Claire Cameron

    Side view of woman in silhouette using smartphone against illuminated blue screen

    The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is worried about cell phones. Under the department, the Food and Drug Administration has removed webpages that asserted the devices are safe, according to the Wall Street Journal. And HHS, headed by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., reportedly plans to research the possible health effects of radiation emitted by cell phones.

    The FDA removed online information that said scientists have not connected exposure to radiofrequency (RF) waves, emitted by cell phones, to health problems in users.

    Some of the removed webpages contained “old conclusions,” an HHS spokesperson told the Wall Street Journal. The spokesperson also said that researching cell phone radiation would “identify gaps in knowledge.” The agency provided a similar statement to Scientific American, adding that the research was “directed by President Trump’s MAHA Commission.”


    On supporting science journalism

    If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


    The administration has not provided any new evidence for the moves. So what does the science about cell phones say?

    It’s a “complex subject,” says Kenneth Foster, a professor emeritus at the department of bioengineering at the University of Pennsylvania, who has studied the health risks of cell phones.

    “People have been arguing about health effects of RF radiation from cell phones for decades,” he says.

    For years, the official stance of federal health agencies such as the FDA was that there was no evidence of a causal link between cell phone use and cancer. That conclusion was also shared by the Federal Communications Commission, which regulates cell phones. Still, some scientists have raised alarms about cell phones and potential health risks, including cancer, although more quality research is needed to full understand what, if any, effect cell phones have on the body.

    In 2011 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of the World Health Organization, has noted that radiofrequency waves are “possibly carcinogenic to humans,” but it hasn’t identified a causal link. (The agency did not immediately respond to a request for comment.) And a handful of studies in lab rats suggest that exposure to RF radiation may be linked with cancer. But it’s unclear whether those results would apply to humans, and studies in humans have been inconsistent and limited in scope and efficacy.

    What is clear, however, is that cell phones do seem to have one obvious negative health effect—on our mental health, Foster says.

    “[There] seems to be stronger evidence for cognitive effects from using cell phones and excessive use of screens, a different matter,” he says. “Also don’t text while driving!”

    It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

    If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

    I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

    If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

    In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

    There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link

    Related Posts

    Science

    Could this ancient burial site be the oldest lethal plague outbreak?

    June 17, 2026
    Science

    Watch sharks use manta rays to scratch unreachable itches

    June 17, 2026
    Science

    NASA data reveals weird x-ray changes in the exploded ruins of dead stars

    June 17, 2026
    Science

    Math predicts humans could go extinct in about 17,000 years

    June 17, 2026
    Science

    Proposed White House regulations could kill 5,000 clinical trials, analysis finds

    June 17, 2026
    Science

    Ozempic maker Novo Nordisk breach exposed patients’ clinical trial data

    June 16, 2026
    Editors Picks

    Tiny predatory dinosaur weighed less than a chicken

    February 26, 2026

    A trip to the center of Knicks merch mania

    June 8, 2026

    Rams should be overwhelming SB faves after blockbuster trade

    June 2, 2026

    Opinion | Feeling Nihilistic? You’re Not Alone.

    June 3, 2026

    Lululemon appoints a Nike veteran as its new CEO

    April 23, 2026
    About Us
    About Us

    Welcome to Benjamin Franklin Institute, your premier destination for insightful, engaging, and diverse Political News and Opinions.

    The Benjamin Franklin Institute supports free speech, the U.S. Constitution and political candidates and organizations that promote and protect both of these important features of the American Experiment.

    We are passionate about delivering high-quality, accurate, and engaging content that resonates with our readers. Sign up for our text alerts and email newsletter to stay informed.

    Latest Posts

    IEEE’s 2026 Education Week Emphasized Lifelong Learning

    June 17, 2026

    Jelly Roll Gets To Scrubbing As Divorce News Goes Viral

    June 17, 2026

    ‘I’m the boss’, Trump says at G7, as he warms to Ukraine’s war aims

    June 17, 2026

    Subscribe for Updates

    Stay informed by signing up for our free news alerts.

    Paid for by the Benjamin Franklin Institute. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
    • Privacy Policy
    • About us
    • Contact us

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.