Test time has arrived: the first person has been treated in a highly anticipated gene therapy trial that aims to coax aged cells to take on a younger identity.
The clinical trial will test a novel approach that involves turning on three genes that seem to “partially reprogram” old cells, allowing them to behave as if they were young again. Some scientists argue that partial reprogramming could rejuvenate old organs. But this trial will test activation of the three genes as an approach for treating disease — in this case, a form of glaucoma, a disease that can cause blindness.
The hope is that the proteins encoded by these genes will enable regeneration of neurons in the optic nerve, which connects the eye to the brain and can be damaged in people with glaucoma. These neurons do not normally regenerate in adults. The company sponsoring the trial, Life Biosciences in Boston, Massachusetts, announced on 9 June that it had treated its first participant.
On supporting science journalism
If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
The stakes are high. The trial will test the safety of the reprogramming approach, which is a lingering concern for the field. Animal studies in several labs have suggested that partial reprogramming can be done safely, but there are fears that it could tip some cells into a cancerous state.
“Reprogramming has a big upside if it can be used safely in people,” says Matt Kaeberlein, co-founder of Optispan, a longevity-focused preventative medicine company in Seattle, Washington. “The technology is still really early, and the potential for catastrophic side effects is high.”
As a result, the eye is likely a good first place to try the technique, says Kaeberlein, because the chances of life-threatening side effects are lower with changes to the eye than to some other organs.
Turn back the clock
The goal of partial reprogramming is to nudge aged adult cells back in time, restoring features of young cells without pushing the old cells so far back that they lose their specialized identity — and function — entirely. To do so, Life Biosciences harnesses three of the four genes that, in the laboratory, can be manipulated to reprogram adult cells to a stem-cell like state.
In 2020, researchers in David Sinclair’s lab at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, and their colleagues, found that activating these three genes in mice with damaged optic nerves promoted neuron regeneration and reversed vision loss in aged mice and mice with glaucoma. Since then, Life Biosciences has studied the approach in rodents and monkeys and has not seen serious adverse effects of the treatment, says Sharon Rosenzweig-Lipson, chief scientific officer at the company.
In the clinical trial, Life Biosciences aims to treat as many as 12 people with glaucoma and to eventually include some participants with a severe, acute condition called NAION that also causes nerve damage in the eye.
The company relies on a virus commonly used in gene therapy to shuttle the three reprogramming genes into retinal ganglion cells, whose long arms make up the optic nerve. As an added safety feature, the system is designed so that the genes are switched on when the participant takes an antibiotic called doxycycline. If the antibiotic is withdrawn, the genes switch off. “It gives us a lot of control,” says Rosenzweig-Lipson. “And the ability not just to turn it on, but to turn it off and not leave on expression longer than is necessary to rejuvenate the cells.”
True youth
Success in the trial would be a boon to people with glaucoma and NAION, but whether that means that modified cells are truly “younger” and can be reprogrammed to enhance longevity is a bigger question, says Pete Williams, a translational neurobiologist at the Centre for Eye Research Australia in Melbourne.
Rosenzweig-Lipson says the company is proceeding “one age-related disease at a time”. “We’re not looking at whole-body rejuvenation at this point in time,” she says. “We hope to get there someday, but we’re not there now.” Life Biosciences has also been studying its approach in animal models of liver disease.
For eye conditions, Williams welcomes a fresh strategy for treating retinal nerve damage, a field that, he says, does not get enough funding or attention. But the bright public spotlight on Life’s treatment also worries him. “It’s gotten a lot of hype,” he says. “If this goes catastrophically wrong, it might screw us all in the future.”
This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on June 9, 2026.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.